Four players on zero and the whole team scored 59 runs, these records were made in Rajasthan’s shameful defeat

[ad_1]

RR vs RCB, IPL 2023, Rajasthan Royals: In the 60th match of IPL 2023, Royal Challengers Bangalore badly defeated Rajasthan Royals on Sunday. In this match played at Sawai Mansingh Stadium in Jaipur, RCB won the toss and scored 171 runs losing 5 wickets in 20 overs while batting first. Faf and Maxwell hit half-centuries. In response, the Rajasthan team was bundled out for 59 runs in 10.3 overs. RCB won this match by 112 runs. This is Bangalore’s sixth win this season. Four batsmen of RR could not even open the account. At the same time, Shimron Hetmyer played the highest innings of 35 runs.

Made this shameful record

Along with this, Rajasthan Royals have made many embarrassing records. 59 runs is the second lowest inning total of Rajasthan Royals in the history of IPL. Earlier in 2009 also, Rajasthan was bundled out for 58 runs against RCB. On the other hand, if we talk about the lowest innings total in IPL history, then Rajasthan Royals have reached the third place. In IPL 2017, RCB scored 49 runs against Kolkata. Earlier in IPL 2009, Rajasthan was reduced to 58 runs against RCB.

Lowest innings total for Rajasthan

58 vs Royal Challengers Bangalore, Cape Town, 2009
59 vs Royal Challengers Bangalore, Jaipur, Today
81 vs Kolkata Knight Riders, Kolkata, 2011
85 v Kolkata Knight Riders, Sharjah, 2021

Lowest innings total in IPL

49 – Royal Challengers Bangalore v Kolkata Knight Riders, Kolkata, 2017
58 – Rajasthan Royals v Royal Challengers Bangalore, Cape Town, 2009
59 – Rajasthan Royals vs Royal Challengers Bangalore, Jaipur, Today
66 – Delhi Capitals v Mumbai Indians, Delhi, 2017

read this also:

RR vs RCB: Rajasthan Royals got an embarrassing defeat at home, Royal Challengers Bangalore won by 112 runs

IPL 2023: ‘Now people will not say that Devisha came, that’s why she could not score a century’, Surya replied to the trollers

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *